Tuesday, May 14, 2024

Game dev says contract barring “subjective negative reviews” was a mistake

Enlarge / Artist's conception of NetEase using a legal contract to try to stop a wave of negative reviews of its closed alpha. (credit: NetEase)




The developers of team-based shooter Marvel Rivals have apologized for a contract clause that made creators promise not to provide "subjective negative reviews of the game" in exchange for early access to a closed alpha test.


The controversial early access contract gained widespread attention over the weekend when streamer Brandon Larned shared a portion on social media. In the "non-disparagement" clause shared by Larned, creators who are provided with an early download code are asked not to "make any public statements or engage in discussions that are detrimental to the reputation of the game." In addition to the "subjective negative review" example above, the clause also specifically prohibits "making disparaging or satirical comments about any game-related material" and "engaging in malicious comparisons with competitors or belittling the gameplay or differences of Marvel Rivals."



Extremely disappointed in @MarvelRivals.


Multiple creators asked for key codes to gain access to the playtest and are asked to sign a contract.


The contract signs away your right to negatively review the game.


Many streamers have signed without reading just to play


Insanity. pic.twitter.com/c11BUDyka9


— Brandon Larned (@A_Seagull) May 12, 2024


In a Discord post noticed by PCGamesN over the weekend, Chinese developer NetEase apologized for what it called "inappropriate and misleading terms" in the contract. "Our stand is absolutely open for both suggestions and criticisms to improve our games, and... our mission is to make Marvel Rivals better [and] satisfy players by those constructive suggestions."

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments


https://arstechnica.com/?p=2023800&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=blogger

No comments:

Post a Comment